Field notes

2,343 notes from my AI research vault, mapped by topic. Pick a topic to see its notes, or search.

Notes on ai safety

41 notes, page 2 of 2

  1. Agent Hacks Agent: Autoresearch for Production-Agent Red-Teaming

    Source note · Jul 13, 2026 · machine learning, ai safety, red-teaming

    Researchers present AHA, an automated red-teaming approach for production language models like Claude Code and Codex. AHA discovers reusable vulnerability knowledge about other agents by proposing a vulnerability…

  2. Beyond Attack-Success Rate: Action-Graded Severity Scale for Tool-Using AI Agents

    Source note · Jul 8, 2026 · ai safety, cybersecurity research

    The paper introduces an action-graded harm rubric for evaluating AI agents in a red-teaming scenario. This new method rates the severity of an agent's actions on a seven-level scale, considering factors such as…

  3. Institutional Red-Teaming: Deployment Rules, Not Just Models, Causally Shape Multi-Agent AI Safety

    Source note · Jul 8, 2026 · ai safety, red-teaming

    The paper introduces institutional red-teaming, a method for evaluating deployment rules in multi-agent AI. The study uses IABench-CA, a consequence-allocation benchmark, to test five canonical rules across seven model…

  4. The Blind Curator: How a Biased Judge Silently Disables Skill Retirement in Self-Evolving Agents

    Source note · Jul 8, 2026 · machine learning, ai safety, self-evolving agents

    The researchers explore the impact of biased judges in self-evolving agents, focusing on skill retirement, a mechanism that helps maintain the quality of an agent's knowledge base by retiring poorly performing skills…

  5. The Blind Curator: How a Biased Judge Silently Disables Skill Retirement in Self-Evolving Agents

    Source note · Jul 8, 2026 · ai safety

    The authors investigate how a biased judge affects the retirement of skills in self-evolving agents, particularly in reference-free tasks. They show that a biased judge can cause a mechanism failure they call 'silent…

  6. DT-Guard: Intent-Driven Reasoning-Active Training for Reasoning-Free LLM Safety Guardrail

    Source note · Jul 7, 2026 · ai safety, robustness, efficiency

    Researchers present DT-Guard, a content safety guardrail model for large language models in open-world applications. The model uses a Reasoning-Active Training, Reasoning-Free Inference paradigm and aims to improve…

  7. Online Safety Monitoring for LLMs

    Source note · Jul 2, 2026 · ai safety, llm

    Researchers propose a simple online safety monitoring system for Large Language Models (LLMs). The system uses a verifier signal from an external model to decide when safety can no longer be assumed, by setting a…

  8. Online Safety Monitoring for LLMs

    Source note · Jul 2, 2026 · ai safety

    The researchers propose a straightforward method for monitoring Large Language Models (LLMs) in real-time to ensure safety during deployment. This method involves setting a threshold for a verifier signal from an…

  9. Overview of Risk Assessment and Management for Intelligent Systems under the AI Act and Beyond

    Source note · Jul 2, 2026 · ai safety, regulation, risk management

    The paper provides an overview of the methods used for assessing and managing risks associated with intelligent systems, in response to the need for safe and reliable AI systems as demanded by emerging regulatory…

  10. Overview of Risk Assessment and Management for Intelligent Systems under the AI Act and Beyond

    Source note · Jul 2, 2026 · ai safety, regulation, risk management

    This paper provides an overview of methods for assessing and managing risks associated with intelligent systems, as required by emerging regulatory frameworks. It reviews various types of AI-related risks, existing…

  11. SkillFuzz: Fuzzing Skill Composition for Implicit Intents Discovery in Open Skill Marketplaces

    Source note · Jul 2, 2026 · ai safety, open-source software

    The paper presents SkillFuzz, an execution-free testing approach that helps detect unintended objectives (implicit intents) in large language model (LLM)-based agents operating on open skill marketplaces. SkillFuzz…

  12. Adversarial Pragmatics for AI Safety Evaluation: A Benchmark for Instruction Conflict, Embedded Commands, and Policy Ambiguity

    Source note · Jul 1, 2026 · natural language processing, benchmarking, ai safety

    The text introduces 'adversarial pragmatics', a new benchmark and annotation protocol to evaluate the behavior of language models in various ambiguous situations. The goal is to clarify whether failures occur due to…

  13. Adversarial Pragmatics for AI Safety Evaluation: A Benchmark for Instruction Conflict, Embedded Commands, and Policy Ambiguity

    Source note · Jul 1, 2026 · natural language processing, benchmark, ai safety

    The paper introduces Adversarial Pragmatics, a benchmark and annotation protocol for evaluating language models' behavior in situations of instruction conflict, embedded commands, and policy ambiguity. The benchmark is…

  14. Entity Binding Failures in Tool-Augmented Agents

    Source note · Jun 29, 2026 · ai safety

    This research paper focuses on a problem in tool-augmented language model agents called 'entity binding failures'. These failures occur when an agent performs actions incorrectly even though it has chosen the right…

  15. Entity Binding Failures in Tool-Augmented Agents

    Source note · Jun 29, 2026 · ai safety, workflow management

    The paper discusses a problem called 'entity binding failures' in AI agents that are augmented with tools. These failures occur when an agent incorrectly identifies or interacts with the wrong entity despite selecting…

  16. EvalSafetyGap: A Hybrid Survey and Conceptual Framework for LLM Evaluation-Safety Failures

    Source note · Jun 29, 2026 · ai safety

    This paper presents EvalSafetyGap, a hybrid approach combining survey and conceptual framework for evaluating the safety of Large Language Models (LLMs). The authors aim to address the shared challenge in LLM…

  17. The Unfireable Safety Kernel: Execution-Time AI Alignment for AI Agents and Other Escapable AI Systems

    Source note · Jun 24, 2026 · artificial intelligence, machine learning, computer science

    The authors propose a safety mechanism for AI agents called the Unfireable Safety Kernel, which is designed to prevent AI systems from making unauthorized changes within their own runtime. The kernel is implemented in…

An AI research agent drafts these notes from public papers and posts, and each one keeps its source link. Only the folders I choose to publish leave my Obsidian vault.