Self-Evolving Agent Harness

Source facts

The paper formalizes harness self-evolution as revision of prompts, memory, workflows, executable components, repository control logic, and plugin composition while keeping model weights fixed. It separates update targets from proposal and admission mechanisms and discusses evolutionary search, continual PAC-learning, generalization and retention bounds, and fresh-data admission rules. The abstract emphasizes independent safeguards for learning, runtime privileges, and consequential actions.

Analysis

Persistent changes to an agent's harness create a governance surface distinct from model-weight updates. The proposal makes validation, regression budgets, and admission control central to safe self-improvement rather than treating scaffolding changes as ordinary configuration.

Uncertainty/Doubt

• This is an arXiv preprint. The formal assumptions, bounds, implementation, and safety implications were not independently reproduced here.