Source note3 min read
ABSeeker: Training Long-Horizon Search Agents via Answer-Backtracked Credit Assignment
Source
arXiv
arxiv.org/abs/2608.05102v1
Source
- Source name: arXiv
- Source kind: paper
- Authors / organization: Yijun Lu, Rui Ye, Jiajun Wang, Yuwen Du, Tian Jin, Songhua Liu, Siheng Chen
- Venue: arXiv: cs.AI
- Published: 2026-08-05
- Collected: 2026-08-06
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.05102v1
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.05102v1
- DOI: UNKNOWN
Plain-Language Brief
Researchers have proposed a new method called Answer-Backtracked Credit Assignment (ABC) to train long-horizon search agents more effectively. This method converts sparse trajectory-level outcomes into dense step-level supervision that rewards useful actions and suppresses erroneous or redundant ones, leading to better performance on benchmarks like BrowseComp.
What the Document Says
- The paper presents Answer-Backtracked Credit Assignment (ABC) as a method for training long-horizon search agents.
- ABC converts sparse trajectory-level outcomes into dense step-level supervision.
- This framework rewards useful actions and suppresses erroneous or redundant ones.
- ABSeeker, the model trained using ABC, achieves better performance on BrowseComp and BrowseComp-ZH benchmarks.
- With context management, ABSeeker significantly outperforms same-scale agents and matches the performance of larger models.
Key Concepts Mentioned
- long-horizon search agents
- credit assignment
- Answer-Backtracked Credit Assignment (ABC)
- ABSeeker
- BrowseComp
Claims Made by the Document
- Existing methods for training long-horizon search agents fail to distinguish useful actions from erroneous or redundant ones.
- ABC is effective at training long-horizon search agents.
- ABSeeker outperforms same-scale agents and matches the performance of larger models.
Evidence Used
- The paper explains that existing methods treat all steps within a trajectory uniformly, leading to the claim about failing to distinguish useful actions.
- The results from training ABSeeker and testing on BrowseComp demonstrate its better performance and outperforming of same-scale agents.
Methods / Approach
- Answer-Backtracked Credit Assignment (ABC)
- ABSeeker
- Answer-Backtracked Clue Recovery
- Clue-Anchored Step Scoring
- ABC-SFT
- ABC-GRPO
Limitations Stated by the Authors
UNKNOWN
Limitations Noted by the Agent
Agent interpretation — not from the source.
- The paper does not discuss potential limitations of the proposed methods.
Open Questions
- What are the potential limitations of Answer-Backtracked Credit Assignment (ABC) and its application to long-horizon search agents?
Notes for Future Q&A
May include interpretation. Labeled where it does.
- The paper focuses on the method for training long-horizon search agents, but does not discuss potential limitations or challenges in implementing this method.
- The paper uses Qwen3.5-4B dataset with only 8.5k examples to train ABSeeker.
Raw Abstract / Excerpt
Long-horizon search agents must make multiple sequential actions (steps) to search, retrieve, verify, and integrate evidence to reach a final answer. However, existing methods for training these agents typically treat all steps within a trajectory uniformly during both supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL), failing to distinguish useful actions from erroneous or redundant ones. In this paper, we propose Answer-Backtracked Credit Assignment (ABC), a fine-grained credit assignment framework for training long-horizon search agents by converting sparse trajectory-level outcomes into dense step-level supervision that rewards useful actions (even in failed trajectories) while suppressing erroneous or redundant actions. Specifically, given a potentially obscure query and its corresponding ground-truth answer, ABC first performs Answer-Backtracked Clue Recovery, which traces back from the answer to recover intermediate clues required to solve the question. It then applies Clue-Anchored Step Scoring to evaluate each search step against these clues, converting sparse binary outcome supervision into dense step-level rewards. Based on these rewards, we develop ABC-SFT, which reweights the loss of each turn, and ABC-GRPO, which uses the step-level scores as rewards in GRPO. Building on this framework, we train ABSeeker based on Qwen3.5-4B with only 8.5k examples. ABSeeker achieves 37.3% on BrowseComp and 39.1% on BrowseComp-ZH. With context management, the scores further improve to 55.3% and 52.9%, respectively, significantly outperforming same-scale (4B) agents and even matching the performance of larger ones (approximately 30B). These results demonstrate the effectiveness of answer-backtracked step-level credit assignment for training long-horizon search agents.
