Source note3 min read
Future Confidence Distillation in Large Language Models
Source
arXiv
arxiv.org/abs/2607.07626v1
Source
- Source name: arXiv
- Source kind: paper
- Authors / organization: Sahil Kale
- Venue: arXiv: cs.CL
- Published: 2026-07-08
- Collected: 2026-07-09
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.07626v1
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.07626v1
- DOI: UNKNOWN
Plain-Language Brief
The paper investigates how the confidence of large language models evolves during the answering process. It compares pre-solution and post-solution confidence estimates across different models and finds that post-solution confidence is better calibrated and more discriminative. The authors introduce a new method called 'future confidence distillation' which trains predictors using teacher confidence estimates produced by post-solution correctness probes, requiring only pre-solution representations for inference.
What the Document Says
- The paper discusses the importance of reliable confidence estimation in deploying large language models (LLMs).
- Existing approaches treat confidence as a property of completed responses and overlook its evolution during the answering process.
- The authors investigate confidence from a temporal perspective by comparing pre-solution Feeling-of-Knowing (FOK) and post-solution Judgement-of-Learning (JOL) confidence estimates.
- They find that post-solution confidence is better calibrated and more discriminative than pre-solution confidence.
- Linear probes trained on hidden representations recover richer confidence-related information than models explicitly verbalizing.
- The authors introduce 'future confidence distillation', a method to train predictors using teacher confidence estimates produced by post-solution correctness probes.
- These distilled predictors require only pre-solution representations for inference and transfer across datasets within the same domain.
- The findings suggest that confidence-related information evolves throughout the answering process and can be anticipated before answer generation is complete.
Key Concepts Mentioned
- large language models
- confidence estimation
- Feeling-of-Knowing (FOK)
- Judgement-of-Learning (JOL)
- future confidence distillation
Claims Made by the Document
- Reliable confidence estimation is essential for deploying large language models.
- Post-solution confidence is better calibrated and more discriminative than pre-solution confidence.
- Linear probes trained on hidden representations recover richer confidence-related information.
- Future confidence distillation can train predictors using teacher confidence estimates produced by post-solution correctness probes.
Evidence Used
- The paper discusses the importance of reliable confidence estimation...
- They find that post-solution confidence is better calibrated and more discriminative than pre-solution confidence...
- Linear probes trained on hidden representations recover richer confidence-related information than models explicitly verbalizing...
- The authors introduce 'future confidence distillation'...
Methods / Approach
UNKNOWN
Limitations Stated by the Authors
UNKNOWN
Limitations Noted by the Agent
Agent interpretation — not from the source.
UNKNOWN
Open Questions
UNKNOWN
Notes for Future Q&A
May include interpretation. Labeled where it does.
UNKNOWN
Raw Abstract / Excerpt
Reliable confidence estimation is essential for deploying large language models (LLMs) in confidence-aware systems, where downstream decisions such as retrieval, tool use, and adaptive computation depend on accurately estimating answer reliability. Existing approaches, however, largely treat confidence as a property of completed responses, overlooking how confidence-related information evolves throughout the answering process. In this work, we investigate confidence from a temporal perspective by comparing pre-solution Feeling-of-Knowing (FOK) and post-solution Judgement-of-Learning (JOL) confidence estimates across frontier and open-source LLMs. We show that post-solution confidence is consistently better calibrated and more discriminative than pre-solution confidence, while linear probes trained on hidden representations recover substantially richer confidence-related information than models explicitly verbalise. Building on this observation, we introduce future confidence distillation, which trains predictors operating on pre-solution hidden representations using teacher confidence estimates produced by post-solution correctness probes. Despite requiring only pre-solution representations for inference, distilled predictors recover much of the calibration improvement achieved by post-solution confidence, remain highly sample efficient, and transfer across datasets within the same domain. Together, our findings demonstrate that confidence-related information evolves throughout the answering process and can be anticipated before answer generation is complete, enabling significantly more reliable yet low-cost confidence estimation.
