Source note2 min read
From Personas to Plot: Character-Grounded Multi-Agent Story Generation for Long-Form Narratives
Source
arXiv
arxiv.org/abs/2607.00918v1
Source
- Source name: arXiv
- Source kind: paper
- Authors / organization: Aayush Aluru, Chloe Ho, Muhammad Hammouri, Kerry Luo, Myra Malik, Ryan Lagasse, Arjun Bahuguna, Vasu Sharma
- Venue: arXiv: cs.CL
- Published: 2026-07-01
- Collected: 2026-07-02
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.00918v1
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.00918v1
- DOI: UNKNOWN
Plain-Language Brief
A new framework called MAGNET is introduced for generating long-form narratives using multiple agent characters that maintain consistency and coherence in their actions based on a shared world state and evolving story goals. This framework reduces annotations and hallucinations compared to single-model baselines and IBSEN, according to evaluations.
What the Document Says
- A new narrative generation and verification framework called MAGNET is introduced.
- MAGNET uses multiple agent characters grounded in personas that propose actions based on a shared world state and evolving story goals.
- ATLAS is a graph-based pipeline used for comparing scene-level world representations across a generated story to detect hallucinations.
- The study evaluates MAGNET using an LLM editor, pairwise rubric scoring, and ATLAS.
- Compared to single-model prompting and IBSEN, MAGNET reduces annotations by 41% and 34%, respectively, and reduces hallucinations by 50% and 45%, respectively, in long-form narratives of 100 pages.
- Pairwise rubric evaluation shows similar results.
Key Concepts Mentioned
- narrative generation
- multi-agent storytelling
- world state tracking
- evolving story goals
- hallucinations detection
Claims Made by the Document
- MAGNET produces coherent narratives compared to single-model prompting and IBSEN.
- Long-form narratives can emerge from explicit world-state tracking and goal-driven multi-agent generation.
Evidence Used
- Reduced annotations and hallucinations in long-form narratives of 100 pages compared to single-model baselines and IBSEN.
- Pairwise rubric evaluation showing similar results.
Methods / Approach
UNKNOWN
Limitations Stated by the Authors
UNKNOWN
Limitations Noted by the Agent
Agent interpretation — not from the source.
UNKNOWN
Open Questions
UNKNOWN
Notes for Future Q&A
May include interpretation. Labeled where it does.
UNKNOWN
Raw Abstract / Excerpt
Although large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive creative fiction generation, they struggle to maintain narrative consistency and coherent plot lines in long-form stories. In this work, we introduce a unified framework for long-form narrative generation and verification. MAGNET, a multi-agent goal-driven narrative engine for storytelling, generates stories with persona-grounded character agents that propose actions based on a shared world state and evolving story goals, while ATLAS is a graph-based pipeline that compares scene-level world representations across a generated story to detect hallucinations. By evaluating MAGNET using an LLM editor, pairwise rubric scoring, and ATLAS, we show that our framework produces coherent narratives compared to single-model prompting and IBSEN. At 100 pages, MAGNET reduced annotations and hallucinations by 41 and 50%, respectively, compared to the single model baseline and by 34 and 45%, respectively, compared to IBSEN, with pairwise rubric evaluation showing similar results. These results suggest that long-form narratives can emerge from explicit world-state tracking and goal-driven multi-agent generation, providing a foundation for controllable and structurally coherent long-form narrative generation.
