Source note2 min read

PolicyGuard: From Organizational Policies to Neuro-SymbolicCompliance Review Engines

Source

arXiv

arxiv.org/abs/2606.32004v1

Read the source

Source

Plain-Language Brief

The researchers have developed a framework called PolicyGuard to ensure documents comply with an organization's specific policies or guidelines. Instead of relying on large language models for end-to-end prompting, PolicyGuard separates policy formalization, local document interpretation, and symbolic compliance evaluation, making it easier to inspect, update, and test the applied policy logic.

What the Document Says

  • PolicyGuard is a neuro-symbolic framework for policy-grounded document compliance review.
  • It converts organizational policy guidance into an executable review engine consisting of typed relational logic rules and atom-level extraction questions.
  • During review, LLMs answer local questions using retrieved document evidence.
  • A symbolic evaluator applies formal rules to detect non-compliance.
  • PolicyGuard was instantiated and evaluated on company-specific NDA compliance review.
  • By separating policy formalization, local document interpretation, and symbolic compliance evaluation, PolicyGuard makes document review more explicit, maintainable, and systematically testable.

Key Concepts Mentioned

  • PolicyGuard
  • neuro-symbolic framework
  • organizational policies
  • compliance review
  • large language models (LLMs)
  • typed relational logic rules
  • atom-level extraction questions
  • symbolic evaluator
  • NDA compliance

Claims Made by the Document

  • PolicyGuard provides a more explicit, maintainable, and systematically testable method for document review.
  • It separates policy formalization, local document interpretation, and symbolic compliance evaluation.

Evidence Used

  • The researchers describe the development and evaluation of PolicyGuard in their work.

Methods / Approach

  • PolicyGuard uses a combination of neuro-symbolic methods for policy formalization, local document interpretation, and symbolic compliance evaluation.

Limitations Stated by the Authors

  • Not stated in source

Limitations Noted by the Agent

Agent interpretation — not from the source.

  • The effectiveness and scalability of PolicyGuard for various types of policies or documents beyond NDA compliance may not be fully understood.
  • The impact of different LLMs on PolicyGuard's performance is unknown.

Open Questions

  • What are the potential improvements in PolicyGuard's performance with different LLMs?
  • How well does PolicyGuard perform for various types of policies or documents beyond NDA compliance?

Notes for Future Q&A

May include interpretation. Labeled where it does.

  • The text focuses on the development and evaluation of PolicyGuard for company-specific NDA compliance review, so the performance and applicability to other policy areas remain unclear.

Raw Abstract / Excerpt

Policy-grounded document review requires determining whether a target document complies with organization-specific policies, guidelines, or playbooks. While large language models can assist with policy interpretation and document analysis, end-to-end prompting leaves the applied policy logic implicit, making compliance decisions difficult to inspect, update, and test. We present PolicyGuard, a neuro-symbolic framework for policy-grounded document compliance review. PolicyGuard converts organizational policy guidance into an executable review engine consisting of typed relational logic rules and atom-level extraction questions. During review, LLMs answer these local questions using retrieved document evidence, and a symbolic evaluator applies the formal rules to detect non-compliance. We instantiate and evaluate PolicyGuard on company-specific NDA compliance review, where contract clauses must be checked against organization-specific negotiation policies. By separating policy formalization, local document interpretation, and symbolic compliance evaluation, PolicyGuard makes document review more explicit, maintainable, and systematically testable.